I'm still pretty new to overclocking (although I can tell already I'm quite hooked :). This is my first overclock.
I've been studying this forum for several days now and have already learned enough to get my EP45-UD3P/Q9550 box running stably at 3.8 MHz (475x8). Many thanks to all of you who have contributed to this great knowledge-base.
Just a quick question.
I'm noticing what seems to me to be a pretty big difference between the CPU Vcore I set in the BIOS and the one reported by CPU-Z (and every other monitor I have that shows Vcore, e.g. Everest, etc.)
BIOS Setting: 1.37500
CPU-Z Reading: 1.3440
Delta: 31 mV
I have Load Line Calibration (LLC) switched on, before it was even greater under load, when the sag kicked in.
My question is, is it normal to observe such a large delta between the BIOS setting and the sensor reading?
And if so, should the maximum rated voltage for the CPU (1.3625 in my case) be based on the BIOS setting or the one the sensor is showing?
Thanks much for any guidance you can offer on this.
I've been studying this forum for several days now and have already learned enough to get my EP45-UD3P/Q9550 box running stably at 3.8 MHz (475x8). Many thanks to all of you who have contributed to this great knowledge-base.
Just a quick question.
I'm noticing what seems to me to be a pretty big difference between the CPU Vcore I set in the BIOS and the one reported by CPU-Z (and every other monitor I have that shows Vcore, e.g. Everest, etc.)
BIOS Setting: 1.37500
CPU-Z Reading: 1.3440
Delta: 31 mV
I have Load Line Calibration (LLC) switched on, before it was even greater under load, when the sag kicked in.
My question is, is it normal to observe such a large delta between the BIOS setting and the sensor reading?
And if so, should the maximum rated voltage for the CPU (1.3625 in my case) be based on the BIOS setting or the one the sensor is showing?
Thanks much for any guidance you can offer on this.
Comment